US groups report on "secret" substances in fragrance products
In the USA, the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics has published the results of a study it commissioned to test the ingredients of 17 perfumes and fragrance products. In collaboration with Environmental Working Group, which assessed data from the tests and the product labels, the analysis - Not So Sexy, the health risks of secret chemicals in fragrance - revealed that:
- Some 14 of the products tested contained chemicals not listed on their labels – the groups say a loophole in federal law allows companies to claim fragrances as trade secrets
- Ten sensitizing chemicals associated with allergic reactions such as asthma, wheezing, headaches and contact dermatitis
- Four hormone-disrupting chemicals linked to a range of health effects including sperm damage, thyroid disruption and cancer
The groups say the majority of chemicals found in the products have never been assessed for safety by any publicly accountable agency, or by the cosmetics industry’s self-policing review panels.
Responding to the report, the Personal Care Products Council said: "The validity of the report is seriously undermined by its failure to include quantitative measurements of the “secret” ingredients it purported to find." It added that the assertions in the report that some fragrance ingredients could be hormone disruptors "are based on incomplete assessments of available scientific data about potential hormone affects and do not take into account actual exposure in cosmetic products".
Further information
Sign up to free news
Chemical Watch Forum
- ECHA decision letters delay - Chris Braun
- Amendments to REACH Annex I and XIII - Nik Robinson
- Use of Chesar tool - Ineke Gubbels
- The importance of confidential business information - Ernie Rosenberg
- Reduced supply and choice of suppliers due to non-registration - Jon Hughes
- SIEF costs vary widely - Anon
- Who is the importer for REACH in complex supply chains - Anon
- CLP and empty diamonds: what’s the right approach? - Michael Paetzold
- "On the shelves" and "placed on the market" - PGO
- Use of NONS data: is it free, or do you need an agreement? - Franck Thiebault



